33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives from the police is to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the discovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it really is made very clear that police is free to get action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-discipline duties inside the interim period. Read more
13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is established as well as the employee is found guilty after due process of law, check here it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct is not adequate but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful manner. Read more
When there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds small sway. Still, if there is not any precedent while in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state might be deemed with the court.
PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Should you find an error in the written content of the published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or even a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report to your court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Have you been looking for Court Information? You should utilize our site to search for a case or search for any person. Information about the site is updated every 24 hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found over the search site is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. Should the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided via the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in implementing the law. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, for the same level.
17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its first purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more